‘IT IS THE MARK OF AN EDUCATED MIND TO ENTERTAIN A THOUGHT WITHOUT
ACCEPTING IT’*
With the news about Anna Hazare’s announcement of
disbanding the team, which was pivoting the movement for the passage of the Jan
Lok Pal Bill in the Parliament to fight and rein in corruption in public life;
the obvious has happened. The moot question which begs to be answered is the
turn around, which brought about this declaration within days of the fast unto
death being terminated, in the wake of a desire to plunge into politics and
provide to the people a political alternative within the confines of the
existing democratic system in the country. When Anna had suggested a political
option, as a viable one, while sitting on fast at Jantar Mantar; it drew an
instant response from me to engage with Anna and to dissuade him from doing so,
not for any other reason but the futility of entering into a field of activity
about which none from the Team had any idea about. Anna’s agitation against
corruption was at best a civil society movement, which had found resonance with
the urban population and as was seen in the 18 months of its existence, with
Jantar Mantar in New Delhi as its hub. There is a discernible difference between
a social upsurge on a people’s issue and undertaking a resolve to provide a
political alternative at a national level on the same. Anna’s forte has
essentially been to pick up social causes and issues in his resident state of
Maharashtra and to carve out a viable resolution to people’s problems, which
impact life and living. His success in his social experiments, in his own
village of Ralegaon Siddhi in Maharashtra, became the frontrunner for his
emergence at the national level as a leader of standing and stature around whom
a national movement could be developed. His solution to prevent alcohol abuse among
people, by tying them around a tree and thrashing them into obedience, was as
politically incorrect as it can be in the present times of liberalisation and
human rights, in the twenty first century. It is no surprise that Anna has not
been able to provide a political alternative; which means a political party
different from the 1100 or so already in existence in the country at the
regional and national level, in his parent state of Maharashtra. Corruption
continues to run rampant here and with the nexus of the heavy weights of
politics and industry, who call the shot and influence most aspects of policy
making and governance, Anna’s personal ideology is insignificant in the larger
matrix of life and living. It is best confined to making incremental changes in
the cultural and economic canvas of villages, which are willing to accept his
brand of thought and innovation. Politics is not Anna’s beat; only because the
system which draws strength from the people to sustain its ideals is an evolved
form of government that has come upon us rather prematurely and too soon.
Riddled with poverty, deprivation and hunger; where literacy and education are
struggling to make their presence felt amongst the huge majority of the people,
who are not as yet empowered to see the larger picture as it would unfurl
itself, beyond caste, community, religion and the emotional strangle hold of the
Nehru – Gandhi scions; politics in India is a far cry from what the
Constitution envisaged it to be. Sixty two years of democracy has brought with
it many gains, but it has also adversely impacted national character, to the detriment
of its underlying essence and spirit. In such a barren field of politics, where
money, muscle and an unholy nexus between morally bankrupt people is its
hallmark; what chance will a man of Anna’s resounding moral and ethical stature
have to make a mark?
Anna retracting his steps from his earlier intention of
going political, albeit by providing support to the chosen candidates desirous
of contesting elections in the political mainstream of the country; is a consequence of his
considered reflection upon the feedback received from many well wishers who were able to see beyond the immediate and
prophecy a lost cause for him. The initial successes of people who were
associated with public causes through various NGOs, emboldened them to chart
deeper waters of national significance and attain visibility. Anna provided an
ideal rallying point for their aspiration and equally drew him into a just
cause of fighting corruption; a cause which was close to his heart while he was
spearheading various agitations and movements in his home State. Anna as the
fulcrum of this movement was an ideal situation to have for the activists, who
buckled up rather prematurely from carrying on with the same and for no good reason,
gave up the agitation at Jantar Mantar. The referendum which was not even
.0000001 % representative of the total population of the country and the counsel
of the 21 civil society luminaries, who advised against the continuation of the
fast, was used as a clever ploy by the Team members to make a face saving exit
from their commitment to pressurise the government to pass the Jan Lok Pal Bill
in the monsoon session of the parliament. Such a volte face on a matter of an
earlier undertaking of do or die seemed rather strange. The government’s jibe
at the activists about having a political ambition and piggy backing on the
shoulders of Anna to further their intent, has justified itself. We all are
aware of the humongous effort involved in launching a political party/movement
and the costs involved in doing the same. But here was a situation which was
waiting to be exploited and had been carved out from the social movement under
the stewardship of Anna Hazare. The social activist got duped into the
suggestion without analysing and weighing the pros and cons of such an
alternative. What was meant by a political alternative? Was it to be something
which was different from the prevailing all party democracy system, which we
have under the constitution? That is not what it turned out to be. Instead, it
was just a ruse to launch another political party which would have selfless and
principled people driven by extreme patriotism, rectitude and probity with a
spirit of service and dedication. These are but platitudes which must surely be
adorning the charter and manifestos of most political parties, who have brought
the country to such a pass, that an alternative is being created. The yawning
chasm between precept and practice could not have been more evident as it is in
the case of our polity, where success by any means is the leitmotif of most
dispensations.
That the reality of the situation has sunk into Anna and
he has taken the decision to dissolve the Team which was purpose specific, is a
case of better late than never. Anna had been drawn into the killing field of
politics by the intransigence on the part of the government to engage with the
Team and by the veiled and covert intent of those who wanted to fulfil their
political ambitions, by using the movement as a launch pad for their designs.
The case of general (retd) V K Singh, who made a grand public appearance and
shared the dais with Anna and his Team, is a testimony to this conjecture.
There must be many others too who nurtured such a desire by riding on Anna’s
credentials and prospering under his shadow. Therefore, while Anna may have
been slow to grasp the motivation of the people who were eager to succumb to
the suggestion of the civil society luminaries, it is good that he has finally
been able to see through the game plan of those who harboured larger political
ambitions, by leap frogging on the movement. I am very happy that Anna has
dissolved the Team, because otherwise a gentleman and a simpleton would have
been tricked into doing something about which he has no clue or else idea
about. Anna it is a matter of extreme pride for those of us who know that, it
is better to lose the whole world than to lose oneself. This is the lesson
which gets driven by your decision, for which the media is at a loss to
understand.
Brigadier (retd) S D Dangwal
+919410900051
*Aristotle.
Respected Sir,
ReplyDeleteIt was my businesss tour and it was a total net profit for me to have met a wonderful person like you and bhabhiji. What a wonderful couple you are.
Sir, there is always hidden and personal agenda of people in public life. They are there with a purpose. Purpose can be anything and everything. No doubt Anna is a honest person but he needs a team. Nothing can be done alone. People like us can either support, oppose or just do drawing room talk. Corruption is in the blood of mankind. You have please people to get your work done.
Your lines saying that Anna was able to see through the game plan of those who harboured larger political ambition is exactly what I mean to say. There is nothing wrong in having any political ambition but the good news is that we can expect and pray Arvind Kejriwal has the ambition with good interntions towards the nation. I am sorry to write that he will not be able to win much seats.
My best wishes to your for all your future blogs.