The Destruction of Sports in India
Ever since Suresh Kalmadi, the disgraced and
criminally charge sheeted erstwhile President of the Indian Olympic Association
(IOA), made his foray into the management and administration of first the Indian
Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF) and subsequently the IOA, the National
Sports Federations (NSFs) and the State Olympic Associations (SOAs) were politicized and made into the personal fiefdoms of politicians; who did little
else than exploit their charge for making their presence in their political
constituency, for political gains and advantage. The other minions who bent
over backwards to please and help sustain these pseudo sports leaders for near
perpetuity, enjoyed the loot that was on offer as a quid pro quo for the trust
reposed in them through the instrument of the vote cast in their favour, in the
democratic dispensation that governs the constitution of sports bodies. The
present imbroglio which has ensnared the elections to the offices in the
executive committee is a disaster which was waiting to happen, sooner than
later. The corpulent and vernacular Abhay Singh Chautala, who is the sole
aspirant to the post of President IOA and is most likely to be elected
unopposed in the elections, as and when these are held in the immediate future,
is himself involved in a controversy for the arbitrary manner in which the elections
in the Indian Amateur Boxing Federation (IABF) were held, wherein his brother
in law has been passed on the baton for a period of four years to preside over
the future of the pugilists, who will train and compete under the aegis of the
said federation. Not only that, to add insult to injury, he has supported the
candidature of a tainted person, who made national headlines by philosophically
espousing different hygiene standards of Indians and Europeans, during the
turbulent build up to the Commonwealth Games in Delhi, 2010. He is none other
than the scam embroiled Dr Lalit Bhanot, who is contesting un opposed for the
office of the Secretary General IOA.
Like the politics of the country and its disgraced
politicians, the fate of the IOA and the NSFs / SOAs is no different, wherein
criminals who were lodged in the country’s Tihar Jail, continue to take shelter
behind the facade of not having been proven guilty in a court of law, which
moves like a donkey in dispensing judgement. While a judgement awaits
promulgation, the interim period is used to advantage by the accused, under the
labyrinthine tenets and provisions of law. The argument is used to justify
assertions of little minds, which hide behind the canons and procedures of
Indian jurisprudence. The political leadership of the country is replete with
examples of such lumpish persons, who become a precedent to quote when arguing
in favour of venality in public life. Lalit Bhanot and his future first
executive in the IOA are persons who flog this argument to their positional
advantage. What has sports management and administration in the country come to?
Where the country is at a loss to find such suitable persons to tenant the pivotal
offices of the President and Secretary General of the apex body, IOA. There couldn’t
be a bigger shame to engulf the country’s sport, at a time when things are
looking bright for its sportspersons in the wake of their performance in the
just concluded London Games. The prospect of the IOA being de recognised by the
international conglomeration of national sports associations, the International
Olympic Committee (IOC) and being debarred from participating in events held
under its aegis, is a loaded possibility that stares Indian sportspersons.
Having anticipated the existing situation as it seizes
Indian sports today, I as the Secretary of the Army Sports Control Board (ASCB)
had put up a proposal to the Chairman Integrated Staff (CIS) to the Chiefs of
Staff Committee (CSC), way back in 2004, to restructure the sports organization
within the Armed Forces and make an attempt to seek affiliation of each of the
Services, viz Army, Navy, and Air Force to the NSFs and the IOA. This would
enable the Services to leverage its interests within the federation and the
association and take control of the happenings, as these would affect and impact
sports and sportspersons. By making this happen, each of the Service would have
had three votes in the election process to any of the office bearers in either the
NSFs or else the IOA. In a democratic dispensation where numbers and
correspondingly votes is an imperative ingredient to acquire authority or else
enable to make a good choice of people to steer sports bodies for the larger
good of sports and sportspersons, ours would have been a major presence to
contend with. But it was most unfortunate that, the proposal was dropped for
considerations which emanated more from the colour of the uniforms than any
objections to its inherent merits. Well, that is how many a good suggestion or
else a recommendation is dropped, only because it stems from abject
parochialism than a larger good that encompasses the interests of the
multitude. And history is replete with such instances, which spring up from time
to time, only to be ignored by those who could have shown some sagacity and vision
for a noble cause, which serves the interests of a much larger spread of people.
Had we exerted our will at that point in time to go with the proposal of
seeking individual affiliations for the Army, Navy and The Air Force, ours
would have been a conglomerate which would have called the shots in cleansing
the Augean Stables of Indian Sports.
The threat which looms large and real over the
horizon of Indian Sports, with the rot which has eaten into the vitals of the
sports bodies and has not been stemmed, could have possibly been avoided, had
our Lt Generals, Air Marshals and Vice Admirals not succumbed to the demons of
the mind, which always prevent one from taking a bold and out of the box
decision. An opportunity was missed and we continue to wallow in the sad state
of affairs, which obtain in our sports management and administration culture.
The IOA is obdurate and pig headed in not adopting the very same provisos of
the Olympics Charter as contained in clauses 16 (3) and 19 (2 and 3), regarding
the age and tenure criterion of office bearers and as reiterated in the Sports Code
Bill, enunciated by the Government. Thereby, making a case for the IOC to
interpret the matter as one of Government interference in the affairs of the IOA
and hence not maintainable in keeping with its constitution. The IOC, should it
come true on its veiled threat, will put to shame the country and assail the
sports interests of the country’s youth. What a pity that such a mess, has been
given as a legacy by these unscrupulous politicians, who have been playing this
joke on the people of India for far too long.
Brigadier (retd) S D Dangwal
+919410900051
No comments:
Post a Comment